Super Audio CD

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Super Audio CD
SACDlogo.svg
Media typeOptical disc
EncodingDigital (DSD)
Capacity4.38 GiB / 4.7 GB (Single Layer and Hybrid[a])
7.92 GiB / 8.5 GB (Dual Layer)
Read mechanism650 nm laser[b]
Developed bySony & Philips
UsageAudio storage
Optical discs

Super Audio CD (SACD) is a read-only optical disc format for audio storage, introduced in 1999. It was developed jointly by Sony and Philips Electronics, and intended to be the successor to the Compact Disc (CD) format.

The SACD format offers more audio channels (e.g. surround sound), a higher bit rate, and longer playing time than a conventional CD. The SACD is designed to be played on an SACD player; however, a hybrid SACD contains a Red Book Compact Disc Digital Audio (CDDA) layer which can be played on a standard CD player.

History[edit]

The Super Audio CD format was introduced in 1999.[1] Royal Philips and Crest Digital partnered in May 2002 to develop and install the first SACD hybrid disc production line in the United States, with a production capacity of three million discs per year.[2] SACD did not achieve the same level of growth that compact discs enjoyed in the 1980s,[3] and was not accepted by the mainstream market.[4][5][6]

The first broadcast of an SACD on BBC Radio was in March 2000. The programme was an interview between Eric Kingdon (Sony), Colin Mackenzie (Hi-Fi Corner) and Kit Frazer (BBC Radio Scotland). The disc played was Mariah Carey's #1's compilation.[7][failed verification]

By 2007, SACD had failed to make a significant impact in the marketplace; consumers were increasingly downloading low-resolution music files over the internet rather than buying music on physical disc formats.[1] A small market for SACD has remained, serving the audiophile community.[8]

Content[edit]

Main article: List of SACD artists

By October 2009, record companies had published more than 6,000 SACD releases, slightly more than half of which were classical music. Jazz and popular music albums, mainly remastered previous releases, were the next two most numerous genres represented.[9][10]

Many popular artists have released some or all of their back catalog on SACD. Pink Floyd's album The Dark Side of the Moon (1973) sold over 800,000 copies by June 2004 in its SACD Surround Sound edition.[11] The Who's rock opera Tommy (1969), and Roxy Music's Avalon (1982), were released on SACD to take advantage of the format's multi-channel capability. All three albums were remixed in 5.1 surround, and released as hybrid SACDs with a stereo mix on the standard CD layer.

Some popular artists have released new recordings on SACD. Sales figures for Sting's Sacred Love (2003) album reached number one on SACD sales charts in four European countries in June 2004.[11]

Between 2007 and 2008, the rock band Genesis re-released all of their studio albums across three box sets. Each album in these sets contains the album on SACD in both new stereo and 5.1 mixes. The original stereo mixes were not included. The US & Canada versions do not use SACD but CD instead.

By August 2009 443 labels[12] had released one or more SACDs. Instead of depending on major label support, some orchestras and artists have released SACDs on their own. For instance, the Chicago Symphony Orchestra started the Chicago Resound label to provide full support for high-resolution SACD hybrid discs,[13] and the London Symphony Orchestra established their own 'LSO Live' label.[14]

Many of the SACD discs that were released from 2000-2005 are now out of print and are available only on the used market.[8][15] By 2009, the major record companies were no longer regularly releasing discs in the format, with new releases confined to the smaller labels.[16]

Technology[edit]

SACD is a disc of identical physical dimensions as a standard compact disc; the density of the disc is the same as a DVD. There are three types of disc:[17]

  • Hybrid: Hybrid SACDs are made with a 4.7 GB SACD layer (also known as the HD layer), as well as a CD (Red Book) audio layer readable by most conventional Compact Disc players.[18]
  • Single-layer: A DVD-5 made with one 4.7 GB SACD layer.
  • Dual-layer: A DVD-9 made with two SACD layers, totaling 8.5 GB, and no CD layer. Dual-layer SACDs can store nearly twice as much data as a single-layer SACD.[c]

Unlike hybrid discs, both single- and dual-layer SACD's are incompatible with conventional CD players and cannot be played on them.

A stereo SACD recording has an uncompressed rate of 5.6 Mbit/s, four times the rate for Red Book CD stereo audio.[17] Other technical parameters are as follows:

CD layer (optional) SACD layer
Disc capacity 700 MB[19] 4.7 GB[17]
Audio encoding 16-bit pulse-code modulation 1-bit Direct Stream Digital
Sampling frequency 44.1 kHz 2 822.4 kHz (2.8224 MHz)
Audio channels 2 (stereo) Up to 6 (discrete surround)
Playback time if stereo 80 minutes[20] 110 minutes[17]

Commercial releases commonly included both surround sound (five full-range plus LFE multi-channel) and stereo (dual-channel) mixes on the SACD layer.[citation needed] Some reissues however, retained the mixes of earlier multi-channel formats (examples include the 1973 quadraphonic mix of Mike Oldfield's Tubular Bells and the 1957 three-channel stereo recording by the Chicago Symphony Orchestra of Mussorgsky's Pictures at an Exhibition, reissued on SACD in 2001 and 2004 respectively).

Disc reading[edit]

A Super Audio CD uses two layers and the standardized focal length of conventional CD players to enable both types of player to read the data.

Objective lenses in conventional CD players have a longer working distance, or focal length, than lenses designed for SACD players.[d] This means that when a hybrid SACD is placed into a conventional CD player, the infrared laser beam passes the SACD layer and is reflected by the CD layer at the standard 1.2 mm distance, and the SACD layer is out of focus. When the same disc is placed into an SACD player, the red laser is reflected by the SACD layer (at 0.6 mm distance) before it can reach the CD layer. Conversely, if a conventional CD is placed into an SACD player, the laser will read the disc as a CD since there is no SACD layer.[17][21]

Direct Stream Digital[edit]

Main article: Direct Stream Digital

SACD audio is stored in Direct Stream Digital (DSD) format using pulse-density modulation (PDM) where audio amplitude is determined by the varying proportion of 1s and 0s. This contrasts with compact disc and conventional computer audio systems using pulse-code modulation (PCM) where audio amplitude is determined by numbers encoded in the bit stream. Both modulations require neighboring samples to reconstruct the original wave, the more the lower frequency that can be encoded.

DSD is 1-bit, has a sampling rate of 2.8224 MHz, and makes use of noise shaping quantization techniques in order to push 1-bit quantization noise up to inaudible ultrasonic frequencies. This gives the format a greater dynamic range and wider frequency response than the CD. The SACD format is capable of delivering a dynamic range of 120 dB from 20 Hz to 20 kHz and an extended frequency response up to 100 kHz, although most currently available players list an upper limit of 70–90 kHz,[22] and practical limits reduce this to 50 kHz.[17] Because of the nature of sigma-delta converters, one cannot make a direct technical comparison between DSD and PCM. DSD's frequency response can be as high as 100 kHz, but frequencies that high compete with high levels of ultrasonic quantization noise.[23] With appropriate low-pass filtering, a frequency response of 20 kHz can be achieved along with a dynamic range of nearly 120 dB, which is about the same dynamic range as PCM audio with a resolution of 20 bits.[citation needed]

Direct Stream Transfer[edit]

To reduce the space and bandwidth requirements of DSD, a lossless data compression method called Direct Stream Transfer (DST) is used. DST compression is compulsory for multi-channel regions and optional for stereo regions. This typically compresses by a factor of between two and three, allowing a disc to contain 80 minutes of both 2-channel and 5.1-channel sound.[24]

Direct Stream Transfer compression was also standardized as an amendment to MPEG-4 Audio standard (ISO/IEC 14496-3:2001/Amd 6:2005 – Lossless coding of oversampled audio) in 2005.[25][26] It contains the DSD and DST definitions as described in the Super Audio CD Specification.[27] The MPEG-4 DST provides lossless coding of oversampled audio signals. Target applications of DST is archiving and storage of 1-bit oversampled audio signals and SA-CD.[28][29][30]

A reference implementation of MPEG-4 DST was published as ISO/IEC 14496-5:2001/Amd.10:2007 in 2007.[31][32]

Copy protection[edit]

SACD has several copy protection features at the physical level, which made the digital content of SACD discs difficult to copy until the jailbreak of the PlayStation 3. The content may be copyable without SACD quality by resorting to the analog hole, or ripping the conventional 700 MB layer on hybrid discs. Copy protection schemes include physical pit modulation and 80-bit encryption of the audio data, with a key encoded on a special area of the disc that is only readable by a licensed SACD device. The HD layer of an SACD disc cannot be played back on computer CD/DVD drives, and SACDs can only be manufactured at the disc replication facilities in Shizuoka and Salzburg.[33] [34] However, a PlayStation 3 with an SACD drive and appropriate firmware can use specialized software to extract a DSD copy of the HD stream.[35]

Sound quality[edit]

Sound quality parameters achievable by the Red Book CD-DA and SACD formats compared with the limits of human hearing are as follows:

CD SACD Human hearing
Dynamic range 90 dB,[36]
120 dB (with shaped dither)[37] 		105 dB[19] 120 dB[38]
Frequency range 20 Hz – 20 kHz[19] 20 Hz – 50 kHz[17] 20 Hz – 20 kHz (young person);
upper limit 8 to 15 kHz (middle-aged adult)[38]

Comparison with CD[edit]

In September 2007, the Audio Engineering Society published the results of a year-long trial, in which a range of subjects including professional recording engineers were asked to discern the difference between high-resolution audio sources (including SACD and DVD-Audio) and a compact disc audio (44.1 kHz/16 bit) conversion of the same source material under double-blind test conditions. Out of 554 trials, there were 276 correct answers, a 49.8% success rate corresponding almost exactly to the 50% that would have been expected by chance guessing alone.[39] When the level of the signal was elevated by 14 dB or more, the test subjects were able to detect the higher noise floor of the CD-quality loop easily.[40] The authors commented:

Now, it is very difficult to use negative results to prove the inaudibility of any given phenomenon or process. There is always the remote possibility that a different system or more finely attuned pair of ears would reveal a difference. But we have gathered enough data, using sufficiently varied and capable systems and listeners, to state that the burden of proof has now shifted. Further claims that careful 16/44.1 encoding audibly degrades high resolution signals must be supported by properly controlled double-blind tests.[40]

Following criticism that the original published results of the study were not sufficiently detailed, the AES published a list of the audio equipment and recordings used during the tests.[41]

Since the Meyer-Moran study in 2007,[42] approximately 80 studies have been published on high-resolution audio, about half of which included blind tests. Dr. Joshua Reiss, of the Queen Mary University of London, and a member of the Audio Engineering Society (AES) Board of Governors, performed a meta-analysis on 20 of the published tests that included sufficient experimental detail and data. In a paper published in the July 2016 issue of the AES Journal,[43] Dr. Reiss says that, although the individual tests had mixed results, and that the effect was, "small and difficult to detect," the overall result was that trained listeners could distinguish between hi-resolution recordings and their CD equivalents under blind conditions: "Overall, there was a small but statistically significant ability to discriminate between standard quality audio (44.1 or 48 kHz, 16 bit) and high resolution audio (beyond standard quality). When subjects were trained, the ability to discriminate was far more significant."

Comparison with DVD-A[edit]

Contradictory results have been found when comparing DSD and high-resolution PCM formats. Double-blind listening tests in 2004 between DSD and 24-bit, 176.4 kHz PCM recordings reported that among test subjects no significant differences could be heard.[44] DSD advocates and equipment manufacturers continue to assert an improvement in sound quality above PCM 24-bit 176.4 kHz.[45] A 2003 study found that despite both formats' extended frequency responses, people could not distinguish audio with information above 21 kHz from audio without such high-frequency content.[46] In a 2014 study, however, Marui et al. found that under double-blind conditions, listeners were able to distinguish between PCM (192 kHz/24 bits) and DSD (2.8 MHz) or DSD (5.6MHz) recording formats, preferring the qualitative features of DSD, but could not discriminate between the two DSD formats.[47]

Playback hardware[edit]

The Sony SCD-1 player was introduced concurrently with the SACD format in 1999, at a price of approximately US$5,000.[48] It weighed over 26 kilograms (57 lb) and played two-channel SACDs and Red Book CDs only. Electronics manufacturers, including Onkyo,[49] Denon,[50] Marantz,[51] Pioneer[52] and Yamaha[53] offer or offered SACD players. Sony has made in-car SACD players.[54]

SACD players are not permitted to offer an output carrying an unencrypted stream of DSD.[55]

The first two generations of Sony's PlayStation 3 game console were capable of reading SACD discs. Starting with the third generation (introduced October 2007), SACD playback was removed.[56] All PlayStation 3 models however will play DSD Disc format. PlayStation 3 was capable of converting multi-channel DSD to lossy 1.5 Mbit/s DTS for playback over S/PDIF using the 2.00 system software. The subsequent revision removed the feature.[57]

Several brands have introduced (mostly high-end) Blu-ray Disc and Ultra HD Blu-ray players that can play SACD discs.[58]

Unofficial playback of SACD disc images on a PC is possible through freeware audio player foobar2000 for Windows using an open source plug-in extension called SACDDecoder.[59] Mac OS X music software Audirvana also supports playback of SACD disc images.[60]

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Hybrid SACD’s also feature a 700 MB CD layer placed behind the SACD layer.
  2. ^ The CD layer of a Hybrid SACD is read with a 780 nm laser.
  3. ^ Like most dual-layer DVD’s, the data spiral for the first layer is encoded from the inside out, and the second layer is encoded starting from the point where the first layer ends and ending at the innermost part of the disc.
  4. ^ In SACD-capable DVD, Blu-ray and Ultra HD Blu-ray players, the red DVD laser is used for reading SACD’s.

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Jack Schofield (2 August 2007). "No taste for high-quality audio". The Guardian. Retrieved May 29, 2009. Such a format—Super Audio CD (SACD)—has been out there since September 1999. And now, it's dying.
  2. ^ "Crest National and Philips Partner to Bring SACD Hybrid Disc Manufacturing to the USA". Newscenter.philips.com. 2002-05-30. Retrieved 2011-12-31.
  3. ^ Mark Fleischmann Are DVD-Audio and SACD DOA? April 2, 2004 "the CD tidal wave was so aggressive that it swept away everything in its path including the terms album and record. I keep waiting for a high-resolution audio to trigger a similar tsunami. But tiny islands of SACDs and DVD-Audio titles in my local Tower Records have not grown into mighty continents." [1] Retrieved on January 16, 2010.
  4. ^ C|Net News, March 26, 2009 Betamax to Blu-ray: Sony format winners, losers by Steve Guttenberg. [2] "SACD was praised by audiophiles, but fizzled in the market. Sony Records no longer releases new SACD titles" (This is not entirely true; while Sony Classical does not appear to be making new SACD releases, Sony Classical in Germany and Japan made SACDs as recently as June 5, 2009 Sony Classical Germany Sony Music Japan) Retrieved on May 29, 2009.
  5. ^ Stereofile eNewsletter, January 10, 2006. Io Saturnalia! by Wes Phillips. [3] Mentions "the failure of SACD and DVD-A to gain traction." Retrieved on May 28, 2009.
  6. ^ Audio Video Revolution, October 19, 2006. The Symbolism Of Losing Tower Records by Jerry Del Colliano. "The pure failure of SACD and DVD-Audio as high resolution formats was analogous burning down a small town." [4] Retrieved on May 28, 2009.
  7. ^ www.hificorner.co.uk - wayback machine
  8. ^ a b "The 10 Best Audiophile SACDs Ever - Many Are Out Of Print". Audiophilereview.com. Retrieved 2013-03-06.
  9. ^ High Fidelity Review. News. Retrieved on May 20, 2009.
  10. ^ SA-CD.net
  11. ^ a b High Fidelity Review. Universal Music Artists Hit SACD Gold and Silver in Europe. Retrieved on May 18, 2009.
  12. ^ SA-CD.net. FAQ
  13. ^ Chicago Resound label retrieved June 6, 2009
  14. ^ London Symphony Orchestra – Buy Recordings retrieved June 6, 2009
  15. ^ Sinclair, Paul (January 30, 2013). "Top 10: SACDs you can afford to buy". Retrieved 2013-03-11.
  16. ^ Guttenberg, Steve (July 16, 2009). "Are SACD and DVD-Audio dead yet?". CNET. Retrieved 2013-03-11.
  17. ^ a b c d e f g Extremetech.com, Leslie Shapiro, July 2, 2001. Surround Sound: The High-End: SACD and DVD-Audio. "A stereo SACD recording has a data rate of 5.6Mbps, which is four times the stereo CD data rate of 1.4Mbps." Retrieved on May 20, 2009.
  18. ^ PC Magazine Encyclopedia Definition of Hybrid SACD Retrieved June 16, 2009
  19. ^ a b c Middleton, Chris; Zuk, Allen (2003). The Complete Guide to Digital Audio: A Comprehensive Introduction to Digital Sound and Music-Making. Cengage Learning. p. 54. ISBN 978-1592001026.
  20. ^ Clifford, Martin (1987). "The Complete Compact Disc Player." Prentice Hall. p. 57. ISBN 0-13-159294-7.
  21. ^ How A Hybrid Super Audio Compact Disc (SACD) Works "SACD players are equipped with optical pick-ups that emit a 650 nanometer wavelength laserlight that is reflected by the DSD layer. The optical pick-ups in all CD players, however, emit a 780 nanometer laserlight which is transparent to the DSD layer, so only the CD layer is read" Retrieved June 16, 2009
  22. ^ Reefman, Derk; Nuijten, Peter. "Why Direct Stream Digital is the best choice as a digital audio format." (PDF) Audio Engineering Society Convention Paper 5396, May 2001.
  23. ^ Ambisonic.net. Richard Elen, August 2001. Battle of the Discs. Retrieved on May 20, 2009.
  24. ^ practical-home-theater-guide.com Direct Stream Digital Technology Retrieved June 3, 2009
  25. ^ ISO/IEC (2006-03-14). "ISO/IEC 14496-3:2001/Amd 6:2005 – Lossless coding of oversampled audio". ISO. Retrieved 2009-10-09.
  26. ^ ISO/IEC (2007-08-06). "ISO/IEC 14496-4:2004/Amd 15:2007 – Lossless coding of oversampled audio". ISO. Retrieved 2009-10-09.
  27. ^ ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11/N6674 (July 2004), ISO/IEC 14496-3:2001/FPDAM6 (Lossless coding of oversampled audio). (DOC), retrieved 2009-10-09
  28. ^ ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 N7465 (July 2005). "Description Lossless coding of oversampled audio". chiariglione.org. Retrieved 2009-10-09.
  29. ^ ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 N7465 (July 2005). "Description Lossless coding of oversampled audio". Archived from the original on 2007-02-03. Retrieved 2009-12-28.
  30. ^ ISO/IEC (2009-09-01), ISO/IEC 14496-3:2009 – Information technology – Coding of audio-visual objects – Part 3: Audio (PDF), IEC, retrieved 2009-10-07
  31. ^ ISO/IEC (2007), ISO/IEC 14496-5:2001/Amd.10:2007 – Information technology – Coding of audio-visual objects – Part 5: Reference software – Amendment 10: SSC, DST, ALS and SLS reference software (ZIP), ISO, retrieved 2009-10-07
  32. ^ ISO/IEC (2007-03-01), ISO/IEC 14496-5:2001/Amd.10:2007 – SSC, DST, ALS and SLS reference software, ISO, retrieved 2009-10-09
  33. ^ "Sony Starts Hybrid Super Audio CD Production Facilities in Europe". SA-CD.net. 2003-01-22. Retrieved 2007-07-12.
  34. ^ "Details of DVD-Audio and SACD". DVDdemystified.com. Retrieved 2007-07-12.
  35. ^ "sacd-ripper".
  36. ^ Fries, Bruce; Marty Fries (2005). Digital Audio Essentials. O'Reilly Media. p. 147. ISBN 978-0-596-00856-7.
  37. ^ http://xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html “With use of shaped dither ... the effective dynamic range of 16 bit audio reaches 120dB in practice”
  38. ^ a b Rossing, Thomas (2007). Springer Handbook of Acoustics. Springer. pp. 747, 748. ISBN 978-0387304465.
  39. ^ Galo, Gary (2008). "Is SACD doomed?" (PDF). Audioxpress.com. Retrieved February 11, 2017.
  40. ^ a b E. Brad Meyer & David R. Moran (September 2007). "Audibility of a CD-Standard A/D/A Loop Inserted into High-Resolution Audio Playback" (PDF). J. Audio Eng. Soc. Audio Engineering Society. 55 (9): 775–779 – via drewdaniels.com.
  41. ^ Paul D. Lehrman: The Emperor's New Sampling Rate Mix online, April 2008.
  42. ^ "Audibility of a CD-Standard A/D/A Loop Inserted into High-Resolution Audio Playback" (PDF). J. Audio Eng. Soc. Retrieved 24 March 2015.
  43. ^ Reiss, Joshua D. (2016-06-27). "A Meta-Analysis of High Resolution Audio Perceptual Evaluation". Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 64 (6): 364–379. doi:10.17743/jaes.2016.0015.
  44. ^ Blech, Dominikp; Yang, Min-Chi. "DVD-Audio versus SACD: Perceptual Discrimination of Digital Audio Coding Formats." (PDF) Audio Engineering Society Convention Paper 6086, May 2004.
  45. ^ "The 1-Bit Advantage – Future Proof Recording" (PDF). Korg. Retrieved 2011-12-31.
  46. ^ Toshiyuki Nishiguchi, Kimio Hamasaki, Masakazu Iwaki, and Akio Ando, "Perceptual Discrimination between Musical Sounds with and without Very High Frequency Components" [5] Published by NHK Laboratories in 2004
  47. ^ Marui, A., Kamekawa, T., Endo, K., & Sato, E. (2014, April). Subjective evaluation of high resolution recordings in PCM and DSD audio formats. In Audio Engineering Society Convention 136. Audio Engineering Society.
  48. ^ "The Sony SCD-1 SACD Player". @udiophilia. Retrieved 2006-05-18.
  49. ^ Onkyo's list of CD Players shows a single SACD player, the C-S5VL. Retrieved March 21, 2012
  50. ^ Denon's web page shows a single SACD player, the DCD-SA1. Retrieved June 3, 2009
  51. ^ Marantz's list of Hi-Fi Components shows one SACD player and Marantz's "Reference series" list shows four SACD players. Retrieved June 3, 2009
  52. ^ The PD-D6-J and PD-D9-J are two SACD players that Pioneer offers. Retrieved June 3, 2009
  53. ^ Yamaha's web page shows the CD-S1000 and CD-S2000 SACD players. Retrieved June 3, 2009
  54. ^ "Sony Announces Three Super Audio CD Car Stereo Players". High Fidelity Review. Archived from the original on 2007-03-02. Retrieved 2007-01-18.
  55. ^ practical-home-theater-guide.com SACD Playback Requirements and Content Protection "SACD compatible players are not permitted to send DSD digital content over an unencrypted digital audio link" Retrieved June 18, 2009
  56. ^ "Why did Sony take SA-CD out of PS3 again?". PS3 SACD FAQ. Retrieved 2009-01-04.
  57. ^ "Firmware v2.01". PS3SACD.com. November 22, 2007. Retrieved August 11, 2010.
  58. ^ "Super Audio CD-compatible Blu-ray Disc players". Retrieved 2009-10-21.
  59. ^ Maxim V. Anisiutkin. "Super Audio CD Decoder". SourceForge. Retrieved 18 March 2012.
  60. ^ "Audirvana Plus". Audirvana. Retrieved 26 November 2013.

Bibliography[edit]

External links[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Super_Audio_CD&oldid=964097004"